如果說昨天考托福的小伙伴是難過到不行，那考雅思的小伙伴就是開心到不行了！昨日份的雅思好像比平常的都要簡單些，突然這么簡單還真有點不適應(yīng)。所以說昨天考試的孩子就是運氣好賺到了！溫馨提示，千萬不要和托福小伙伴面前展現(xiàn)你的喜悅，小心友盡！

好了，日常考勤速遞和寫作范文送上~

（不完全回憶，僅供參考）

口語不多說，直接給到為4月份本場高頻題，請小伙伴們扎實準備

1.    Describe a rule at your school that you agree or disagree

2.    Describe a time you had to save money

3.    Describe a special day out which didn’t cost a lot

4.    Describe a letter that is important to you

5.    Describe a product you bought recently that you are happy with   

Passage 1

題目：The Baobabs of Madagasgar 猴面包樹

題型：6判斷題+7填空題

題號：舊題

文章大意： 第一部分：背景。面包樹的生長區(qū)域、生長周期、品種以及Avene des Baobads 是最佳的觀賞地區(qū)。

第二部分：這種樹具備的宗教和精神記憶。

第三部分：具體說明Avene des Baobads這個地區(qū)的環(huán)境，其實是man-made的，因為當(dāng)?shù)氐?/span>clearance以及burning等行為

第四部分：面臨一定的風(fēng)險及其原因，比如water、cyclone；在森林地區(qū)面臨風(fēng)險有三個原因：farming、logging和animals。

第五部分：Jim Bondie用兩種方式把這一物種記錄下來：編制遠航圖，或用兒童書籍記錄

Passage 2

題目：The use of dietar supplements 維生素缺鈣

題型：5段落信息配對題+5人物名稱配對題+4總結(jié)填空題

題號：新題

文章大意： 

第一段：維生素C其實并沒有什么效果，防御流感的效果和常洗手沒有什么區(qū)別。scientific research shows that這句話其實非常具有誤導(dǎo)性，因為真正的科研只有極少數(shù)人懂，還有很多研究人員可能持相反的態(tài)度

第二段：研究人員Mark Bollard首先指出一個研究成果可能很快又會被其他研究人員否定，這讓大眾很迷茫。還有，目前所謂的random trail并不具備很高的可信度，更不用說drug companies的隨機調(diào)查，并沒有科學(xué)依據(jù)，只是做行為分析。

第三段：Roy Jackson通過大量的樣本說明很多營養(yǎng)品作用不大，但是有些營養(yǎng)品在有些階段還是有效的，比如folic acid（葉酸）對于孕婦。

第四段：研究人員Reid對于鈣片的分析，曾經(jīng)的實驗受眾是一群特定的女性，不具代表性。原本說鈣片可以增加bone density,其實效果不大，而且會對心臟有影響。

第五段：研究人員Mark Bollard支持以上觀點。比如雖然很多人不認可，但是鈣片銷量確實下降了60/100

第六段：一種新型營養(yǎng)品Omega3不能被生產(chǎn)，研究者Stonehouse自己就在吃這個產(chǎn)品，認為有用。Mkeaf認為還是keep a  good diet就好了。 

Passage 3

題目：Business Innovations

題型：5判斷題+4名字配對題+5填空題

題號：新題

文章大意：公司創(chuàng)新改革innovation

Section   1

咨詢——租房詢問，10填空  

Section   2

介紹——待回憶，10選擇  

Section   3 

討論——研究調(diào)查，3單選 7匹配   

Section   4

學(xué)術(shù)——倫敦地下屋宇，6填空 4匹配   

小作文

類型：折線圖

題目：英國某個地方4種類型的房子數(shù)據(jù)，從2010年到2020年的變化

大作文

題目類別：科技類  

提問方式：優(yōu)缺點 

考試題目：  

In the modern world, it is possible for people to shop, work and communicate by the help of the Internet without any face-to-face contact.  Is it a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

慣例送上寫作范文~ 

We live in an age of electronic communication, and the Internet does help us a lot of ways, but have we gone too far? This is a great question, with the answer being different for everyone who still stresses the value of face-to-face contact. Just because we have computers and smartphones readily available, this does not mean that interpersonal communication could lose its worth.

Electronic technology has dramatically changed the ways we shop, work and communicate in a virtual environment and has brought about a myriad of benefits. From emails to instant messaging to Skype to social networking, today’s society has a variety of methods of connecting people around the world, and we are beginning to learn that the Internet can be effective in making communication faster and easier than ever before. Besides, the cost of internet communication is significantly low when compared with traditional means of communication like face-to-face meetings. The technology connects us to our online suppliers, colleagues in the workplace, families and friends from just any location for a fraction of the cost required to host an interpersonal meeting. On the contrary, with the face-to-face contact, we need to spare time, cash to travel and so on.  Thus, why bother communicating face-to-face when with the help of the Internet we can do the same tricks?

That being said, scientific evidence is mounting that the advent of digital technology is having a detrimental effect on interpersonal relationships.  As more communication up and down the line at work is done electronically, face-to-face discussion can easily fall by the wayside because some of the dialogue and personal touch can start to disappear.  Nevertheless, everything from body language and facial expressions to attentiveness and engagement can indicate different thoughts and feelings—each of which can only be truly observed through face-to-face communication. So, despite the clear upsides of digital communication, there are circumstances under which there is no substitute for face-to-face communication and it would be a mistake to think otherwise. In short, while face-to-face communication is fading and not always an option due to distance or other factors, we should not forget about it completely.

In conclusion, it is necessary to balance those Internet interactions with face-to-face communication. Where the opinions differ is a matter of degrees.  It is hard to say how far the Internet would go, but face-to-face communication has not yet been and never will be replaced by technology.